The Antimonopoly Committee of Ukraine (ACU) filed a case against PAO \" TNA Bank \" , AKB \" Ukrsotsbank \" and PAO\" UKRSIBBANK \"on the fact of imposing customers specific insurance companies. This was announced by committee chairman Alexei Kostusev, the press service of the AMC .
What do you think? say
"The question of the imposition of banks insurance today is a very sharp For many citizens, especially for those who got in trouble because with the crisis. Each additional percentage payment on credit agreements is for their principal. Unfortunately, for some reason, not all banking institutions and insurance companies understand this and continue discriminatory practices. That's why we filed the case against them. If banks will not give up this practice, shall be punished. If you do not understand normal human language, a language recommendations, we will talk to them differently, "- said Kostusev. As reported in July 2010, the Committee formally appealed to the leaders PJSC "Raiffeisen Bank Aval", PJSC "OTP Bank", PJSC "UkrSibbank" PJSC CB "Privatbank" and CRA "Ukrsotsbank" warning of the early cases of violation of Banks anticompetitive legislation if they continue to do complaints from borrowers. April 29 Committee recommended that the PSC CB "Privatbank" PJSC "Raiffeisen Bank Aval" Bank "Ukrsotsbank" PAO "OTP Bank" and PAO "UkrSibbank" to conduct a transparent selection of companies that will insure borrowers at the conclusion of loan agreements with banks. All of these banking institutions formally indicated a willingness to meet the requirements received, but still in committee continues to receive signals from consumers.
News by topic:
Previous and next news :